Use Mana Potion or Runic Mana Injector and Cast Arcane Blast /castsequence blast wave, flamestrike(Rank 9), dragon's breath, flamestrike(Rank 8).Players can also use the 'Castsequence' macro to have one button rotate the usage of the stand AoE rotation. Use 10 is the Hand Enchant Hyperspeed Accelerators Cast AoE At Cursor Players can add '/cast Icy Veins', '/use 10', and '/cast Berserking' as well if it does not cause haste capping. This uses the /cqs (Clear Cast Sequence) to add a brief delay Fireball and Pyroblast to ensure that Ignite occurs from a potential crit from pyroblast instead of fireball Activate All Cooldowns and Cast Fireball Which is why they went back and explained why they we’re changing it back.Ensure Ignite Occurs From Pyroblast Not Fireball. Having an interupt that we could use while still casting is very very very nice. They did it when they tried to remove spell lock from the Felhunter, which we appreciated but did very much disagree with that decision. It would be nice if they did provide more details as to why they made the decision they did. Yes they made changes to Hunter pets to reduce confusion, but they still continue to increase the amount of available pets with different abilities.Īt first people assumed it was because of PVP but that didn’t make sense because most non-demo locks run grim sac in PVP so there’s not a demon out there. Which then puts the different Hunter pets in the picture. They still said they we’re removing the observer because it caused confusions. I don’t accept that because they addressed this first without addressing every example of it across the game that the rational is less availing We also get all our demons pretty early when the Hunter just gets a starter one and then has to go out of their way to find more and understand what they do. Nowhere as confusing as it is for Hunters. As long as they continue to provide variety with the Hunter pets their decision to limit the types of demons Warlocks is based off incorrect assumptions.įor non-Demo locks our demons are either because we need a tank/aoe damage (Blueberry), interrupt/spell eating (Felhunter/observer), single target damage/cc (Succubus/Incubus), magic debuff purge/quick target swap (imps). Which is actually a lot less confusing then with Hunter pets.

Though there really isn’t as we summon based upon the pet ability we need at the time. Like Hunters, we Warlocks just want more variety in which demons we summon.

However it should be an option in the barbershop like they are doing with the newer demon models of existing demons. Now I agree it shouldn’t be a glyph option.

They are however clearly not paying attention to the player base with decisions like that. Are they intentionally being deceitful? Honesty probably not. So for Blizzard to single out a glyph option for warlocks as “confusing” is straight bs. I get that the plethora of pets and their different abilities is confusing but they are still there and they continue to add new pets and the new pets have both a “class” as well as pet abilities unique to either the pet or the pet family. It still flies in the face of Blizzard’s rationale. Read a few comments up where I address this and agree that hunter pets are also very confusing for new players

Mage glyphs